Who is my dad?

I, Jeremy Welch, am now seeing clearly that in many ways I have been fighting against myself for a few decades, and more intensely in the last two years.

The publication of this essay will be a little bit different than some of my other recent essays. I am publishing the notes of this essay in a more raw format, and then editing along the way. I also expect to add more content as I learn more. I may change some of my conclusions based on new evidence, but as of today (September 21st 2026) the evidence presented and current conclusions have built into a solid foundation over the course of months and months of research. I still have plans to shift my writings to another blogging platform, so I may adapt the format of this essay when I finally do finish that. I am publishing this now despite the anticipated changes because the claims in this essay, if true, are so enormous that even a few days difference in publication would affect a lot of people. Additionally, the format shows the true state of my thinking and awareness on the topic, which has shifted from denial and disbelief to steady-but reserved-acceptance over the last year after seeing increasing evidence.

This essay is structured first as a personal record of my recent research, second as an explainer to my family, third as an explainer to professional contacts, and fourth as an explainer to both the past and the future of humanity (this last one is a strange statement for me to write, but by the end of the essay I hope it is clearer why I am taking that seriously).

Below is a set of observations and facts that are semi-organized, which I plan to structure more in the next few weeks and months:


From a responsibility standpoint, I think one conclusion I have to make is that with my increasing confidence that there is some truth to me having millions and millions of children on the scale of a Manhattan project program, I need to always behave in a way that would be a good example to all children. That awareness has been a partial driver for some of the work I have performed and written about in the last year. It has also been a partial driver for the positions I have taken in my divorce case. That kind of awareness is what Pawpaw would also say.

As for the timing, I have been researching and accumulating evidence over the last year, but it is not until the finger observations that I felt there to be overwhelmingly clear that Steve is not my father. I already had phenotypical and behavioral differences with Steve (including catching him lying directly to me multiple times), but the finger observations are far too distinct (especially in combination with the other factors). And I considered that publishing this may hurt him emotionally, but the repeated lies that he has made in the last year to me, and the numerous chances I have given him to speak openly about what he knows (I asked him months ago to please write about it privately, as I am doing now, and he refused), mean that I am far less concerned with that now. The problem of not discussing this topic openly, especially if there are children out there with big questions, is far more important. Even a response of “yes, I am noticing that there is a pattern, but I do not fully understand it and here is what I learned and when I learned it” is far better than no response or no discussion of this topic.

I also considered the impact that publishing these findings may have on Homer or Sinclaire. I have credible photo evidence, which I have reported to the FBI, that Homer was being abused sometime in 2024 or 2025. It is possible he was being abused because of the findings I am outlining here (as a way to threaten or control me, though I never received direct threats with his name before 2025), and it is possible that someone was trying to get his genetic material despite his young age. I know that is strange to write, but with the weight of evidence and the complexity of this situation, it is important to state openly. Not stating this openly, while I am discussing the wider findings above, could actually put Homer in more danger. I should also say that I have offered multiple times for Sinclaire to have full custody of Homer, if she would only enable a once a year meeting so that I could see him and be a positive presence in his life. She refuses, and with no clear reason. I would prefer to have full custody given Sinclaire’s demonstrated mental health issues and history of false accusations, or joint custody but with a better collaborative parenting approach. I have been denied all of those possibilities by her to date, and again, with no explanation. I am stating this openly because I am concerned that, if the story of my old genetics is true, that Sinclaire or someone else could try to control Homer because of actual or perceived unique genetics that he may have. Sinclaire has implied in a few emails that she does not think Homer is my biological son, but he does retain a number of features that are very similar to me, so I need to be a responsible parent even if he is not my biological son.

All of this information also means being careful about who I date and marry and have more kids with. I have always wanted to be married with kids, and I have struggled to understand why it has been so hard for me to find a good match in my life. I have been on only one semi-date recently, and I have not dated nor slept with anyone else since sleeping with my ex-wife Sinclaire (which was at at least 8 months to a year before the divorce).

I should also state that I have only ever dated and slept with women. I was asked that at least once or twice during my travel over the last year. I have friends that are gay and I am not judging their decisions, but I have never felt that kind of attraction myself.

I should also say that if there is a plausible theory that something of this scale happened, and if others know about it and thought that it could have been them as the father, I now find it incredibly hard to understand how any man could date a woman younger than him (at least beyond a few years). I also see the act of sex and procreation as incredibly delicate, and I have tried to again be an example to any future children about the best way to handle sex within a healthy relationship (and preferably a marriage).

If you’re wondering why I would talk so openly about something so complicated and largely unprovable at scale, the simple answer is that — if it is true — then the consequences of NOT talking about it are enormous. If it is false, then the consequences of talking about it are relatively minimal. If it is false, it is also possible that some others have been told a false story. However, through seeing the plausibility of my case, which has proof points that go far beyond anyone else that I can find or see, these other people may be able to see the weakness of their own case. But again, if it is true, then every one of these children should know the truth, or as much of the truth that I or others can explain.

Further, every one of the parents today should also know the truth. If it were true that something like this happened and if these kids are indeed mine (which is what I am being told by multiple sources), then at the very least I owe all the other parents the truth (or as much of the truth as I can uncover, especially the part that all of this was done without any consent or awareness on my part). If it is true that something like this happened and that these kids are not mine, then I think it is still critically important to discuss the issue of paternity openly. I was told that it was my decision whether to go public with multiple geopolitical issues that I was made aware of last year (including this topic).

I think for the sake of genetic diversity, that future parents should choose their spouse and have kids with their spouse with confidence that the children are biologically theirs. If a woman decided that she wanted to have a child of mine, I would openly discuss that, but I would want it to be done in an open and clear and structured way. I would never want something like that to be hidden. I am stating this openly and clearly (despite it being a discomforting statement), because I am concerned that others are attempting to hide similar behavior and I would never condone that (from me or from others).

If the generations of young people today and tomorrow are anything like me (and increasingly like me), they will be furious if they find out that something like what I’m describing happened and furious that what happened was not done in an open and clear way. That is true even if the people that may have limited (or complete) responsibility could not see the full picture (and is also true if certain parties, myself included, had no idea). So despite the complexity of this situation, it is better for me to publish something about my research and understanding of the situation now, rather than waiting.

If any of what I am noting above is true, then I will close this by noting that PawPaw Preacher Welch would have wanted everyone to forgive each other and try to work together. I am trying to follow what Jesus said to Peter in Matthew 18:21-22 as much as I can, and I have also been asking others to do the same. Forgiveness does not always mean kindness, but it does mean to respond to any ongoing crimes and bad behavior from a place of learning and compassion and care instead of from a place of hate.

“Then Peter approaching asked him, “Lord, if my brother sins against me, how often must I forgive him? As many as seven times? Jesus answered, “I say to you, not seven times but seventy-seven times.”

 
0
Kudos
 
0
Kudos

Now read this

Catastrophe of the Soul

When we detonate the nuclear bombs we will weep, for we will not be ready, but we will have chosen. “Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn.” Two great catastrophes bear... Continue →